(Solved) : Meyerkord V Zipatoni Co 276 Sw3d 319 Mo Ct App 2008 Plaintiff Greg Meyerkord Meyerkord App Q37155770 . . . .

Meyerkord v. Zipatoni Co., 276 S.W.3d 319 (Mo. Ct. App.2008)

Plaintiff, Greg Meyerkord (“Meyerkord”), appeals from thejudgment dismissing Meyerkord’s action for false light invasion ofprivacy against defendant, The Zipatoni Co. (“Zipatoni”). Meyerkordcon- tends his claim represents the “classic case” of false lightinvasion of privacy. We vacate and remand. Some time prior to early2003, Meyerkord was employed by Zipatoni, a Missouri corpora- tionthat provides marketing services to businesses, and was listed asthe “registrant” for Zipatoni’s account with Register.com for thepurpose of the registration of websites. Meyerkord’s employmentwith Zipatoni ended in 2003.

In 2006, Zipatoni registered www.alliwantforxmasisapsp.comthrough Register.com. Meyerkord was listed as the registrant