Seline operates, as a sole proprietorship, a dog grooming service under the fictitious name “Grooving to Grooming.” She specializes in preparing her canine clients for dog shows.
Unfortunately, one of Susie’s employees used a bad combination of grooming products, causing an extreme amount of hair loss on a prize poodle. The poodle’s owner sued Seline. Seline was not
overly concerned, because she had most of her assets in her own name, and only a small amount of capital invested in her business. Is Seline’s lack of concern about the safety of her personal assets warranted?
A) no, Seline should be concerned about her
PayPal Gateway not configured
PayPal Gateway not configured