Course Solutions Uncategorized (Answered) : Payment of something of value with the intent of inducing referrals is a violation of which of the following statutes? 1) Sta

(Answered) : Payment of something of value with the intent of inducing referrals is a violation of which of the following statutes? 1) Sta

Payment of something of value with the intent of inducing referrals is a violation of which of the following statutes?

1) Stark law

2) Sherman Anti-Fraud Law

3) Antikickback statute

4) False Claims Act

Expert Answer


3. Antikick back statute

Following points will help you to understand this:

Anti kickback statute is violated where something of value whether knowiingly or unknowingly or willfully provide a purpose to induce referrals.
In Startk law they are limited to certain medical services only
Stark law deals with withour requirement of intent while Anti kick Back Statute is for intent of inducing referrals

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

(Solved) : Assignment Identifying Test Cases Using Boundary Value Analysis Equivalence Partitioning O Q35002681 . . . .(Solved) : Assignment Identifying Test Cases Using Boundary Value Analysis Equivalence Partitioning O Q35002681 . . . .

<br/><img src="https://media.cheggcdn.com/media%2Fa1f%2Fa1f78188-c6b1-4b9b-9c6b-3c0fbb3f043c%2Fimage.png" alt="Assignment I: Identifying Test cases using Boundary value analysis and Equivalence partitioning Objective: To identify and do" aria-describedby="d3f"/><img src="https://media.cheggcdn.com/media%2Fc11%2Fc11213a7-d682-4b18-bfa8-deb101829e2d%2Fimage.png" alt="media%2Fc11%2Fc11213a7-d682-4b18-bfa8-de" aria-describedby="d3g"/>Assignment I: Identifying Test cases using Boundary value