A recent study found that racially mixed juries “deliberated longer, raised more facts, and conducted broader and more wide-ranging deliberations” than either all-white or all-black juries. Why do you think this was so? Do you think that “mixed” juries are more likely to avoid groupthink than racially homogeneous juries? Explain your reasoning. What are the implications of this issue for businesses?
Expert Answer
Yes, the above statement is very true as it has been proved quite a few times now that diversity promotes better decision making. When the jury comprises of a mix of people of varies ethnical backgrounds
OR
PayPal Gateway not configured
OR
PayPal Gateway not configured
PayPal Gateway not configured
PayPal Gateway not configured